Review: comparison Canon 135mm f/2L vs. Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II One lens that has a huge loyal fanbase, is the Canon 135mm f/2L USM lens (B&H / Amazon). It has a wide aperture for a medium telephoto lens, and the lens is small and compact. Unassuming. Easy to love. Then the inevitable question comes up from photographers stepping Read more inside
Product description. The Canon EF 70-200 F4L IS II USM is a substantial upgrade over the original model. Its image stabilization now reduces shake by up to 5 stops (versus 3) and is quieter, the body is more durable and coatings have been added to reduce ghosting and flare as well as to keep fingerprints off of the front and rear elements. The
I am trying decide between purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8 or the Canon 70-200 f4 IS, based estrictly on image quality : resolution, image color, contrast and sharpness. (I disregarded the other options in the Canon lenses line-up because I find them too heavy, including the ligther 300mm f/4 IS).
Canon 24-105 vs 70-200 f4 is. Jul 4, 2013. I realize that this has been debated before, but my concern isn't so much about the IQ of the lenses. Just asking for some opinions so I don't have to purchase and resell lenses so much. (I currently own a 5d mark ii, Sigma 35 1.4, a 50 1.8-version 1, a broken 17-40 and a 480exII)
The f/2.8 lens shows a bit of softness at f/2.8, which improves upon stopping down, until it is sharp at f/8. The f/4 version, however, is fairly soft at all aperture settings, with mild improvement at f/8.
My Review of the Canon 70-200 f4 IS.🔥 My presets and tutorials:🔥
b2kUp. 206 484 44 78 17 382 458 288 208
canon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8
